Beneficial Ownership Information (BOI) reporting was introduced by the Corporate Transparency Act of 2021 and implemented by FinCEN at 31 CFR 1010.380. The March 21, 2025 FinCEN interim final rule exempted domestic reporting companies from BOI filing; foreign reporting companies registered to operate in the US remain obligated. This is a live regulatory area — confirm the current state on our status tracker before filing.
The Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) was enacted on January 1, 2021 as Title LXIV of the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021 (Pub. L. 116-283, codified at 31 USC 5336). The statute directed the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) — the Treasury bureau that administers the Bank Secrecy Act — to collect beneficial ownership information from non-exempt US business entities for the stated purposes of combating money laundering, terrorism financing, tax evasion, and other illicit finance.
The implementing rule, codified at 31 CFR 1010.380, became effective January 1, 2024. Under the original rule, an estimated 32.6 million reporting companies — most US LLCs, corporations, and similar state-formed entities — were obligated to file Beneficial Ownership Information reports identifying their beneficial owners and (for entities formed on or after January 1, 2024) their company applicants. Reports go directly to FinCEN through the secure BOI E-Filing portal at boiefiling.fincen.gov and are not part of any public record.
Each BOI report identifies the reporting company itself (legal name, trade names, US street address, jurisdiction of formation, TIN), each beneficial owner (full legal name, DOB, residential address, government ID number plus an image of the document), and — for post-2024 entities — up to two company applicants (the person who filed the formation document, plus the person who directed the filing if different).
On March 21, 2025, FinCEN published an interim final rule (90 FR 13688) exempting domestic reporting companies from BOI reporting. The IFR narrowed the universe of obligated filers dramatically — from roughly 32.6 million entities to under 100,000 (only foreign reporting companies registered in US states remain in scope). The IFR was framed as an interim measure pending public comment and potential further rulemaking. The CTA itself (31 USC 5336) remains in force; only the regulatory exemption protects domestic entities, and Treasury may revise the IFR at any time.
For the live regulatory status — including any post-IFR rule changes, court rulings, or enforcement updates — see our BOI status tracker.
The Corporate Transparency Act has a longer political history than most observers realize. The push for beneficial-ownership disclosure dates back to the early 2000s and reflects more than a decade of bipartisan legislative effort, multiple failed prior bills, and substantial pressure from the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) for the United States to comply with international AML norms.
The FATF identified the United States as one of the few major financial jurisdictions without a beneficial-ownership registry in its 2006 mutual evaluation. US states had become attractive jurisdictions for shell-company formation because Delaware, Nevada, and Wyoming did not collect or disclose owner identity. The 2011 Panama Papers and 2016 Panama Papers follow-on stories repeatedly named US states as facilitators of opaque shell-company structures used by foreign kleptocrats and money launderers.
Senators Carl Levin (D-MI), Chuck Grassley (R-IA), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), and Marco Rubio (R-FL) introduced multiple versions of an Incorporation Transparency and Law Enforcement Assistance Act between 2008 and 2019. Each version failed to pass — opposition came from state secretaries of state, the small-business lobby (NFIB and Chamber of Commerce), and incorporation services who viewed BOI collection as duplicative of bank KYC.
The CTA was finally enacted as part of the NDAA FY2021 (Pub. L. 116-283) on January 1, 2021, over President Trump's veto. The override vote was 81-13 in the Senate and 322-87 in the House — bipartisan supermajorities driven by both AML/national-security concerns and the recognition that US states had become the world's largest source of opaque legal entities.
FinCEN published the final BOI Reporting Rule on September 30, 2022, with a January 1, 2024 effective date. FinCEN later issued a final rule on access to BOI data (December 2023) and the BOI E-Filing portal launched January 1, 2024. The first compliance deadline was January 1, 2025 for entities formed before January 1, 2024 — at which point legal challenges had already produced multiple injunctions.
NFIB v. Yellen (N.D. Ala., March 1, 2024), Texas Top Cop Shop v. Garland (E.D. Tex., December 3, 2024), and a series of related cases produced a chaotic sequence of injunctions and stays. The Fifth Circuit, the Eleventh Circuit, and the Supreme Court were all involved by early 2025. On January 23, 2025 the Supreme Court stayed the Texas Top Cop Shop injunction. On March 21, 2025 FinCEN published the interim final rule exempting domestic reporting companies — defusing most of the litigation by removing the population the plaintiffs represented from the rule's scope. See the litigation timeline at /boi/court-rulings/ for the full sequence.
Under the March 21, 2025 FinCEN interim final rule, the universe of obligated filers narrowed substantially. Today, only foreign reporting companies must file BOI. A foreign reporting company is any entity formed under the law of a foreign country that has registered to do business in any US state or tribal jurisdiction by filing with a secretary of state or similar office.
The trigger is the state-level registration. A foreign entity that operates remotely with US customers but has not registered with any US state secretary of state is not a foreign reporting company under the CTA — though it may still be subject to other US regulatory obligations (sales tax nexus, FDI rules, etc.).
The 23 categorical exemptions in 31 USC 5336(a)(11)(B) still apply on top of the foreign-versus-domestic distinction. A foreign reporting company that also qualifies as, for example, a large operating company (more than 20 full-time US employees, more than $5M gross receipts, physical US office) is exempt by separate rule. See the next section for the full enumeration of the 23 exemptions.
Domestic reporting companies — entities formed by filing with a US secretary of state or similar office — are categorically exempt from BOI filing under the March 21, 2025 interim final rule (90 FR 13688). This is the central change from the original rule and the reason most US LLC owners have no current filing obligation.
The CTA defines a "reporting company" at 31 USC 5336(a)(11)(A) as any corporation, LLC, or other similar entity created by the filing of a document with a secretary of state or similar office. A domestic reporting company is one created under the law of a US state or Indian tribe. Examples: Wyoming LLC, Delaware LLC, California corporation, New York LLC, Nevada series LLC, any US-state-formed entity.
The IFR draws the line at where the entity was formed, not who owns it. A Wyoming LLC owned 100% by a non-resident foreign national is still a domestic reporting company and currently exempt. A Delaware LLC owned by a UK Limited that is itself owned by a Cayman trust is still a domestic reporting company and currently exempt. The exemption tracks the entity's formation jurisdiction, not its beneficial ownership chain.
The IFR is a regulatory exemption, not a statutory one. The CTA (31 USC 5336) remains in force. The implementing regulation (31 CFR 1010.380) remains in force as amended by the IFR. The BOI E-Filing portal remains operational. The penalties for non-filing remain on the books. Treasury has discretion to revise the IFR after the public comment period closes — which it has done before with other Bank Secrecy Act rules.
The IFR was framed as an interim measure responding to two pressures: (a) the litigation cluster (NFIB v. Yellen, Texas Top Cop Shop, etc.) that created legal uncertainty for compliance, and (b) the small-business community's complaints that BOI filing imposed disproportionate compliance burden on entities that did not present meaningful AML risk. By narrowing the rule to foreign reporting companies, FinCEN preserved the rule's enforcement reach against high-risk shell-company structures while removing the 32 million ordinary US small businesses from scope.
Take no current filing action. Monitor /boi/status-tracker/ quarterly for changes. If the IFR is rescinded, Treasury has historically given at least 30-90 days' notice before reinstating filing requirements. Anonymousllc.co will publish status alerts and offer batched filing at $150 per entity if the obligation reinstates.
Separate from the domestic-versus-foreign distinction created by the IFR, the CTA itself enumerates 23 categorical exemptions in 31 USC 5336(a)(11)(B). These exemptions apply across both domestic and foreign reporting companies. A foreign reporting company that qualifies for one of these exemptions is also exempt from filing, regardless of its foreign formation.
This is the exemption that catches the most operating-business attention. To qualify: more than 20 full-time US employees (40+ hour weeks), more than $5,000,000 in US-source gross receipts reported on the prior year's federal tax return (consolidated for parent-subsidiary groups), and a physical office in the US distinct from a residence and used for the entity's business. All three conditions must be met simultaneously. An entity that meets only two of the three is not exempt under this category.
See the full BOI exemptions breakdown for each category's detailed criteria and common fact patterns.
Foreign reporting companies are the population that remains obligated under the current rule. Operationally, this is a small subset of the global business world — entities that have made the conscious choice to register for business in a US state and now have a US disclosure obligation as a result.
Any entity that is (a) formed under the law of a foreign country, and (b) registered to do business in a US state or Indian tribal jurisdiction by filing a document with a secretary of state or similar office. The key trigger is the US-state registration. A UK Ltd. operating remotely from London with US customers but no state registration is not a foreign reporting company. The same UK Ltd. that has filed a certificate of authority in California is.
Same three-part structure as the original rule. Reporting company information: legal name, trade names, current US street address (the foreign-qualification address), jurisdiction of formation (the foreign country), and TIN (either US EIN if obtained, or a foreign tax ID with country). Beneficial owner information: full legal name, DOB, residential address, unique ID number (passport, state ID, or driver license), and an image of that document. Company applicant information: only for entities that registered with a US state on or after January 1, 2024.
Via the FinCEN BOI E-Filing portal at boiefiling.fincen.gov. There is no paper filing option and no filing fee. The portal accepts either the web form (recommended for single filings) or a structured XML upload (for service providers filing in bulk). After submission, the portal issues a confirmation with a tracking number. Anonymousllc.co files BOI for foreign reporting companies at $150 end-to-end (gathering of beneficial-owner information, ID image collection and upload, portal submission, confirmation tracking).
Most foreign reporting companies are: (a) European or Asian SaaS companies that registered in Delaware or California to access US enterprise customers, (b) e-commerce holding entities domiciled in BVI or Cayman that registered in a US state to operate a US-facing brand, (c) family-office investment vehicles registered to hold US real estate, or (d) US subsidiaries of foreign parent groups where the subsidiary is formed in a US state but the parent is foreign. The (d) case is technically a domestic reporting company at the US subsidiary level (and therefore exempt under the IFR), while the foreign parent is not in scope unless it itself has US registration.
A beneficial owner under the CTA (31 USC 5336(a)(3)) is any individual who either directly or indirectly (a) owns or controls at least 25% of the ownership interests of the reporting company, or (b) exercises substantial control over the reporting company. The 25% test is mechanical; the substantial control test is qualitative.
"Ownership interests" includes equity, capital interests, profit interests, convertible instruments, options, and any other instrument that establishes or has the potential to establish ownership of the reporting company. Indirect ownership counts — if an individual owns 50% of a holding LLC that owns 50% of the reporting company, the individual indirectly owns 25% and is a beneficial owner.
An individual exercises substantial control if they: (a) serve as a senior officer (president, CEO, CFO, COO, general counsel, or any officer performing a similar function — title is not dispositive, function is), (b) have authority to appoint or remove any senior officer or a majority of the board of directors (or similar body), (c) direct, determine, or have substantial influence over important decisions made by the reporting company (decisions about the nature, scope, and attributes of the business, the company's major contracts, the structure of compensation for senior officers, etc.), or (d) exercise any other form of substantial control over the reporting company.
An entity can — and often does — have multiple beneficial owners under both prongs simultaneously. A 2-member LLC with equal ownership has two beneficial owners under the 25% test (each owns 50%). A 6-member LLC with equal ownership has zero owners under the 25% test (each owns 16.7%, below 25%), but the LLC's managing member is a beneficial owner under the substantial control test. Senior officers are always beneficial owners under (a), regardless of ownership percentage.
The CTA explicitly excludes five categories: minors (provided a parent or legal guardian is reported instead), nominees and custodians (provided the underlying beneficial owner is reported), employees acting purely as employees and not exercising senior-officer control, inheritors of future-interest rights only, and creditors of the reporting company.
Two patterns recur in intake. First, single-member LLC owners frequently assume they have only one beneficial owner (themselves). True — they own 100% and are a senior officer. Second, multi-member LLCs with passive investors sometimes assume only the managing member is a beneficial owner. False — any passive investor with 25%+ equity is also a beneficial owner, even with no operational role. Third, professional service entities sometimes assume only equity partners count. False — any senior officer (regardless of equity) is a beneficial owner under the substantial control test.
Company applicants are reported only for reporting companies created or registered on or after January 1, 2024. There are at most two company applicants per entity, defined at 31 CFR 1010.380(e).
The first is "the individual who directly files the document that creates the entity, or in the case of a foreign reporting company the document that first registers the entity to do business in the United States." This is the person who physically submitted the Articles of Organization (for domestic entities) or the certificate of authority (for foreign-qualifying entities).
The second is "the individual who is primarily responsible for directing or controlling the filing of the relevant document by another." This is the decision-maker who told the filer what to file. Both individuals are reported if they are different people.
Self-filing US founder: One company applicant — the founder filed the Articles themselves, so they are both the filer and the direction-giver.
Formation service like Anonymousllc.co: Two company applicants — (a) the formation service employee who submitted the Articles, and (b) the founder who instructed the formation service to file. The formation service provides a business address as the applicant's address; the founder provides residential.
Attorney-filed entity: Two company applicants — the paralegal or attorney who submitted the filing, plus the client who directed the filing.
Foreign reporting company: One or two — the individual who filed the US-state certificate of authority, plus (if different) the foreign-entity director or officer who directed the registration.
Same fields as beneficial owners — full legal name, DOB, current address (business address if the filing was done in the course of work, residential address otherwise), unique ID number from a non-expired US passport, US state-issued ID, US driver license, or non-expired foreign passport (only if no US-issued document is available), and an image of that document. The reporting company applicant data is locked in at the time of filing — it is not updated when the reporting company changes.
Entities formed before January 1, 2024 are explicitly exempt from the company applicant reporting requirement under 31 CFR 1010.380(b)(2)(iv). This is because the rule did not exist when those entities were created and FinCEN concluded retroactive applicant identification was infeasible. A Wyoming LLC formed in 2019 reports only its beneficial owners; a Wyoming LLC formed in 2024 reports both beneficial owners and company applicants.
Each BOI filing has three structural parts: reporting company information, beneficial owner information, and (for post-2024 entities) company applicant information. Here is what each part requires.
Same fields as beneficial owners, but with one variation: applicants who file in the course of their work (formation service employees, attorneys, paralegals) provide a business address instead of residential.
A FinCEN identifier is a unique number an individual or entity can obtain by submitting personal identifying information directly to FinCEN through the BOI E-Filing portal. Once issued, the FinCEN identifier can be used in place of the personal information in subsequent BOI filings. This is useful for individuals who are beneficial owners of multiple reporting companies — they can submit their information once, obtain the identifier, and reference it across multiple filings rather than re-submitting personal data each time. See the FinCEN identifier guide for the application process.
Any change to reported information must be filed as an updated BOI report within 30 days of the change. Common triggers: change of beneficial owner residential address, change of senior officer composition, change of reporting company legal name or trade name, expiration of an ID document used as the identifying-number source. Corrections to inaccurate information have a 90-day safe harbor from original filing if filed in good faith.
Filings are submitted electronically at boiefiling.fincen.gov. There is no paper option and no filing fee. The portal accepts two submission modes.
Recommended for single filings. Walk through a series of guided pages: company information, beneficial owner section (repeated for each beneficial owner), company applicant section (for post-2024 entities), document image upload, review, submit. Most single filings take 15-30 minutes including data entry and document uploads. The portal validates input in real time — missing fields and format errors are flagged before submission.
For service providers and large entities filing in bulk. The XML schema is published by FinCEN; service providers (including Anonymousllc.co for clients with multiple entities) can submit batched filings through this channel. The portal returns per-record success/failure tracking.
The portal issues a confirmation receipt with a tracking number. This receipt should be retained as proof of timely filing. The report itself is not publicly searchable. FinCEN may share BOI data only with authorized recipients under 31 USC 5336(c):
The report is NOT available to: the general public, journalists, civil litigants, competitors, private investigators, or commercial data brokers. State business-entity search results are unaffected by BOI filings — your LLC's state-records anonymity is fully preserved.
The portal frequently rejects filings for: (a) image file too large (max 4MB per ID image), (b) image file in unsupported format (only PDF, JPG, PNG accepted), (c) US address format violations (the portal requires standardized USPS formatting), (d) DOB in wrong format (must be MM/DD/YYYY), (e) ID document number with embedded spaces or punctuation. Anonymousllc.co's $150 BOI filing service handles all of these formatting issues end-to-end.
Filing deadlines vary by entity type, formation date, and registration date. Under the current rule, here is the deadline matrix.
No current filing deadline. Domestic reporting companies are exempt under the March 21, 2025 IFR. If the IFR is rescinded or replaced, FinCEN has historically given at least 30 days' advance notice before reinstating filing requirements. Most likely transition: a 30-90 day filing window for previously-exempt domestic entities.
30 days from the date of the change. Triggers include: change of beneficial owner residential address, change of senior officer, change of reporting company legal name, change of US address, change of jurisdiction of formation (rare), or expiration of an ID document used as the identifying number.
30 days from discovery of the error. A 90-day safe harbor applies for good-faith inaccuracies — meaning if you correct an error within 90 days of original filing, no penalty applies even if the original report was technically inaccurate. The safe harbor does not extend to willfully false reports or outright failure to file.
If the IFR is rescinded and domestic reporting companies become obligated again, the deadline structure that applied before the IFR was: entities formed in 2024 had 90 days from formation, entities formed in 2025 or later have 30 days from formation, pre-2024 entities had until January 1, 2025. A future rule reinstating the obligation will likely use similar timing.
The CTA imposes significant civil and criminal penalties for non-compliance. The statutory text is at 31 USC 5336(h). Here is the structure.
Up to $591 per day (inflation-adjusted from the original $500/day, as of 2025 indexing) for each day a willful violation continues, with no statutory cap. A continuous violation of one year can therefore reach approximately $215,000. The civil penalty applies to willful failures to report, willful provision of false information, and willful failure to update or correct.
Up to $10,000 and/or 2 years imprisonment for any person who willfully provides false or fraudulent information, or willfully fails to report or update. The criminal penalty requires proof of willfulness — meaning a knowing and voluntary violation rather than negligence or inadvertent error.
Senior officers of an entity that fails to file may be held personally liable. This is a meaningful departure from typical corporate-liability rules — the CTA pierces the corporate veil specifically for BOI violations.
A person who submits inaccurate information may avoid penalties by correcting it within 90 days of the original filing, provided (a) the error was not intentional, (b) the person had no knowledge at the time of filing that the information was inaccurate, and (c) the correction is filed before the person had actual knowledge that the original filing was inaccurate. The safe harbor does not extend to outright failure to file.
Despite the substantial paper penalties, public enforcement action against BOI non-filers has been limited. As of mid-2026, FinCEN has not publicly announced any BOI-specific civil penalty assessment or criminal prosecution. The enforcement reality reflects three factors. First, the March 2025 IFR removed 32 million domestic entities from the obligated population, dramatically narrowing the enforcement universe. Second, the legal challenges (NFIB v. Yellen, Texas Top Cop Shop) created political and legal headwinds for aggressive enforcement during 2024 and early 2025. Third, FinCEN's enforcement resources are concentrated on high-priority AML and sanctions cases rather than BOI non-filing alone.
That said, BOI non-compliance can serve as an aggravating factor in other enforcement contexts — money-laundering prosecutions, tax-evasion cases, and OFAC sanctions cases routinely include BOI non-filing charges as add-on counts. The realistic risk profile for a foreign reporting company that simply fails to file is: low risk of standalone BOI enforcement, but exposure if the entity attracts attention for any other reason. The $150 cost of filing is, in this calculus, materially less than the downside risk.
See the BOI penalties deep dive for fact patterns and the limited public enforcement examples to date.
BOI reporting has been litigated continuously since the rule took effect in January 2024. The legal challenges have produced a series of injunctions, stays, and Treasury responses that materially shaped the current rule.
The first major district court decision. Judge Liles Burke held that the CTA exceeded Congress's enumerated powers under the Commerce Clause and Necessary and Proper Clause, ruling the statute unconstitutional as applied to the plaintiffs (the National Federation of Independent Business and individual NFIB members). The injunction was limited to the named plaintiffs. The Eleventh Circuit's review of this decision remained pending into mid-2025.
Judge Amos Mazzant issued a nationwide preliminary injunction halting BOI enforcement against all reporting companies. The injunction was stayed by the Fifth Circuit on December 23, 2024, then reinstated by a different Fifth Circuit panel on December 26, 2024, then partially stayed again — a sequence that produced significant compliance whiplash for entities trying to determine their filing obligations during the original January 1, 2025 deadline window.
The Supreme Court granted Treasury's emergency application to stay the Texas Top Cop Shop injunction pending appeal, in a brief order that did not address the merits. The stay restored BOI enforcement nationally — except in cases already covered by separate district-court injunctions in NFIB and other parallel cases.
Faced with continuing litigation and political pressure from small-business advocacy groups, Treasury published the IFR exempting domestic reporting companies. The rule was framed as an interim measure pending public comment and potential further rulemaking. It defused most of the litigation by removing the population the plaintiffs represented from the rule's scope — making the NFIB and Texas Top Cop Shop cases substantially moot for the domestic-entity plaintiffs.
The CTA remains in force as a statute. The implementing regulation as amended by the IFR exempts domestic reporting companies and obligates foreign reporting companies. The original litigation is largely mooted at the district-court level but the constitutional questions remain unresolved. The IFR is reversible by Treasury without statutory action; a future administration could rescind the IFR and reinstate the full filing population. Monitor /boi/status-tracker/ for live status changes.
BOI is a federal regulatory regime, not a state one — so technically the obligation is uniform across all US states. But state-specific factors affect the practical filing picture for any given LLC: when the entity was formed, whether the formation state has its own beneficial-ownership disclosure rule, and how state secretaries of state are responding to the federal rule changes.
Several states proposed state-level beneficial-ownership disclosure rules during 2024-2025 when the federal rule's status was uncertain. New York's LLC Transparency Act (NY State Senate Bill S995A) was the most advanced — it would have required public LLC beneficial-ownership disclosure starting January 2026 — but was vetoed in late 2024 and has not been re-enacted. California explored similar legislation but did not advance it. As of mid-2026, no US state has its own active BOI-style rule that creates a parallel obligation.
For ordinary US LLC owners, the federal status governs everything. Here is the current matrix for the major formation states (all entities currently exempt under the March 2025 IFR):
The state pillars (Wyoming, California, New York, Texas, Florida, etc.) maintain live updates as state legislatures consider new rules. For the master federal status, see the BOI status tracker.
The realistic action items depend on your entity type. Here are the three scenarios.
Currently exempt. Take no filing action. Monitor /boi/status-tracker/ quarterly for changes. Bookmark this page and check during March-April annually (the IFR's first-year anniversary). If the IFR is rescinded, expect a 30-90 day filing window. Anonymousllc.co will publish status alerts and offer batched filing at $150 per entity. Do not file proactively before the obligation reinstates — there is no benefit to filing under the current rule and the filing creates an updated-filing obligation if any data changes.
Currently obligated. File initial BOI report through boiefiling.fincen.gov within 30 days of US-state registration (or, if registered before March 26, 2025 and you missed the April 25, 2025 deadline, file as soon as possible to limit ongoing daily penalty exposure). The Anonymousllc.co BOI Initial Filing service ($150) handles this end-to-end: beneficial-owner data collection, ID image collection and upload, portal submission, confirmation tracking, and follow-up updates for the first year.
The test is the entity's jurisdiction of formation. If formed by filing with a US state secretary of state (any of the 50 states or US territories), it is domestic. If formed under the law of a foreign country and then registered in a US state, it is foreign. The ownership of the entity is irrelevant — a Wyoming LLC owned 100% by a foreign person is still domestic. A UK Ltd. owned 100% by a US person is still foreign. If you registered to do business in any US state via a "Certificate of Authority" or "Foreign LLC Registration" filing, you are likely a foreign reporting company.
This is worth repeating because it confuses many buyers: BOI reports are filed with FinCEN only. They are not part of any public record. They are not viewable by journalists, civil litigants, competitors, data brokers, or the general public. State business-entity search results are completely unaffected by BOI filing status. Your Wyoming LLC remains anonymous on Wyoming records regardless of whether you file BOI or not. See the anonymous LLC pillar for the public-records anonymity framework.
WhatsApp the team for a 5-minute intake.